<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Johan&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be</link>
	<description>A personal blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:08:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Little Brother By Cory Doctorow</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-little-brother-by-cory-doctorow/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-little-brother-by-cory-doctorow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cory Doctorow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A must read if you are interested in science-fiction, freedom of speech, war on terror, surveillance state, hacking, ... It also offers career advice for teens.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>&#8220;<strong>Little Brother</strong>&#8221; is the first complete novel by <strong>Cory Doctorow</strong> that I have read. Before this I have read the short story &#8220;When Sysadmins Ruled The World&#8221; and I follow him on Twitter and RSS as he has some very  interesting things to say on his blogs and in his column in the Guardian.</p>
<h3>Little Brother by Cory Doctorow</h3>
<p>From the author&#8217;s site:</p>
<blockquote><p>Marcus, a.k.a “w1n5t0n,” is only seventeen years old, but he figures he already knows how the system works–and how to work the system. Smart, fast, and wise to the ways of the networked world, he has no trouble outwitting his high school’s intrusive but clumsy surveillance systems.</p>
<p>But his whole world changes when he and his friends find themselves caught in the aftermath of a major terrorist attack on San Francisco. In the wrong place at the wrong time, Marcus and his crew are apprehended by the Department of Homeland Security and whisked away to a secret prison where they’re mercilessly interrogated for days.</p>
<p>When the DHS finally releases them, Marcus discovers that his city has become a police state where every citizen is treated like a potential terrorist. He knows that no one will believe his story, which leaves him only one option: to take down the DHS himself.</p></blockquote>
<h3>Review</h3>
<div id="attachment_932" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-932" title="Little Brother" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/LittleBrother.png" alt="Little Brother" width="200" height="301" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Little Brother</p></div>
<p>This book doesn&#8217;t have the scope and depth of George Orwell&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>Nineteen Eighty-Four</strong>&#8221; in which the idea of <strong>Big Brother</strong>, a totalitarian surveillance state, is introduced. <strong>Little Brother</strong> is set in contemporary society, it is fast-paced and a more enjoyable read; it&#8217;s much more of a page-turner than &#8220;<strong>1984</strong>&#8220;.<br />
How to describe this book? I will list just list some keywords and phrases: surveillance state, war on terror, Department of Homeland Security, hacking, freedom of speech, David against Goliath (in this case M1k3y against the DHS), coming of age, love story, totalitarianism, social media, teen techno-geek rebellion, and if you are a teen you might find some valuable career advice in there too. No kidding, read the afterwords by Bruce Schneier and Andrew Huang.</p>
<p>Cory Doctorow&#8217;s novels have been on my to read list for some time now, but after reading &#8220;Little Brother&#8221; they have been moved to the top of the list. I also put &#8220;Little Brother&#8221; on my to buy list because it is a book that I will certainly read again.<br />
&#8220;Little Brother&#8221; by Cory Doctorow was published in 2008 and is freely available for download with the author&#8217;s and publisher&#8217;s permission. I mentioned at the start of this article that Cory Doctorow has interesting things to say, he does, especially about Digital Rights Management.</p>
<p>Rating: <img class="size-full wp-image-453 " title="Rating: 5 of 5 stars" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/rating5.gif" alt="Rating: 5 of 5 stars" width="75" height="15" /></p>
<table class="quotes">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Obscurity is a far greater threat to authors and creative artists than piracy.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Tim O&#8217;Reilly</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<ul>
<li><a title="Cory Doctorow's craphound.com" rel="nofollow" href="http://craphound.com/" target="_blank">Cory Doctorow&#8217;s craphound.com</a></li>
<li><a title="Feedbooks | Food for the mind" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.feedbooks.com/" target="_blank">Feedbooks | Food for the mind</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-little-brother-by-cory-doctorow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: I Shall Wear Midnight By Terry Pratchett</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-i-shall-wear-midnight-by-terry-pratchett/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-i-shall-wear-midnight-by-terry-pratchett/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Pratchett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I Shall Wear Midnight" is the fourth book in the Tiffany Aching series by Terry Pratchett, which, in turn, is part of the larger discworld series. It is a very good story, but it is not a very good traditional discworld story; the tumbling-down-the-rabbit-hole kind of fun has gone and so has some of the sarcasm and wittiness. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>&#8220;<strong>I Shall Wear Midnight</strong>&#8221; is the fourth book in the <strong>Tiffany Aching</strong> series by <strong>Terry Pratchett</strong>, which, in turn, is part of the larger discworld series. The first three books in the Tiffany Aching series are: &#8220;<strong>The Wee Free Men</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>A Hat Full Of Sky</strong>&#8220;, and &#8220;<strong>Wintersmith</strong>&#8220;. I recommend to read them in that order before starting on &#8220;<strong>I Shall Wear Midnight</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<div id="attachment_917" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-917" title="I Shall Wear Midnight" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ishallwearmidnight.jpg" alt="I Shall Wear Midnight" width="200" height="308" /><p class="wp-caption-text">I Shall Wear Midnight</p></div>
<p>Tiffany Aching is 16 and finished her training to become a witch, not just <em>a</em> witch but <em>the</em> witch of the Chalk, or <em>hag o&#8217; the hills</em> as the Nac Mac Feegle would say. She does what witches do: doing her rounds, delivering babies, salving wounds, being there when people die, bandaging legs, taking pain away, and cutting old ladies&#8217; toenails.</p>
<p>Then things start to go bad, an evil has awakened and with it come all the old stories, the stories about evil old witches. It starts with whispers, murmurs, and looks. Then someone picks up a stone. Before you know it they start looking for fire-wood. The evil has set its eyes on Tiffany. I don&#8217;t want to spoil the story, so I will just mention that Tiffany Aching ends up in Ankh-Morpork with a bunch of Nac Mac Feegles, meets a city witch and a legend, &#8230; before returning to the Chalk to face the evil on her own turf and on her own terms, and finds some unexpected allies.</p>
<p>These last couple of years some new elements have entered Terry Pratchett&#8217;s novels: sentiment, romance, drama, tragedy, and some novels have become darker, like this one. This came at the expense of what made the discworld series of comic fantasy novels so unique; a mix of great storytelling, wit, humor, satire, parody, and littered with puns, allusions and culture references. Those elements are not gone, but they are not as abundant as before.</p>
<p>It is a very good story, but it is not a very good traditional discworld story; the tumbling-down-the-rabbit-hole kind of fun has gone. I miss the shear joy, sarcasm, and wittiness of &#8220;<strong>Going Postal</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>The Wee Free Men</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>The Last Continent</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Eric</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Pyramids</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>Thief of Time</strong>&#8220;, &#8230;</p>
<p>Rating:  <img class="size-full wp-image-452" title="Rating: 4 of 5 stars" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/rating4.gif" alt="Rating: 4 of 5 stars" width="75" height="15" /></p>
<table class="quotes">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>The duke had a mind that ticked like a clock<br />
and, like a clock, it regularly went cuckoo.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Terry Pratchett</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-i-shall-wear-midnight-by-terry-pratchett/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banned Books Week 2010</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/banned-books-week-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/banned-books-week-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First time I participated in Banned Books Week. The books I read were: Lady Chatterley's Lover by D.H. Lawrence, Fanny Hill or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure by John Cleland, and Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carrol.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>Banned Books Week</strong> is an annual event celebrating the freedom to read and the importance of the First Amendment.  Held during the last week of September, Banned Books Week highlights the benefits of free and open access to information while drawing attention to the harms of censorship by spotlighting actual or attempted bannings of books across the United States.</p>
<p>The First Amendment:</p>
<blockquote><p>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_890" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-890" title="Fanny Hill" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/fanyhill.jpg" alt="Fanny Hill" width="200" height="319" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Fanny Hill</p></div>
<p>I do not live in the USA, but freedom of speech and expression is equally important in the EU. Banned Books Week was brought to my attention via Twitter by some of my fellow <em>tweeps</em>.</p>
<p>My goal was to read books that are or once were banned. The books I read during the Banned Books Week of 2010 (September 25 &#8211; October 2) are:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Lady Chatterley&#8217;s Lover</strong> by D.H. Lawrence</li>
<li><strong>Fanny Hill or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure</strong> by John Cleland</li>
<li><strong>Alice&#8217;s Adventures in Wonderland</strong> by Lewis Carrol</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Lady Chatterley&#8217;s Lover</strong> has been (temporarily) banned in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Japan, and India for violation of obscenity laws. The book starts good with the observations by Lady Chatterley of the discussions between her crippled husband and his guests on mind and body, relationships, intellect, classes, &#8230; Amusing at first, it becomes rather boring even during the first half of the book. Her longing for a child, her love affair, and her trip to Venice didn&#8217;t make me change my opinion. You don&#8217;t really get to know the characters and the book provides little context for the period just after the first world war in the UK, a period of which I know very little.</p>
<p><strong>Fanny Hil or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure</strong> was banned in the U.S.A in 1821 for obscenity, then again in 1963. First published in 1748 in England, it is considered the first pornography novel. It is one of the most prosecuted and banned books in history, and a synonym for obscenity. I am not familiar with the genre, but I think a better 21st century description would be an <em>erotic novel</em>. I think John Cleland deserves an award for writing a <em>pornographic</em> novel without ever using an obscene or vulgar word.<br />
The story can be summarized as follows: once upon a time a young women went to the big city, to support herself she had to work as a woman of pleasure, she was very good at it and got rich, she found back her first love, and they lived long and happily ever after. It has all the ingredients of a fairy tale, but not one you will see on the Disney channel.<br />
The characters, context and story are better than in <strong>Lady Chatterley&#8217;s Lover</strong>, making John Cleland a better writer than D.H. Lawrence in my opinion.</p>
<p><strong>Alice&#8217;s Adventures in Wonderland</strong> was the most entertaining read of the three. The genre is called <em>literary nonsense</em> and the first chapters of the book were really promising. Alas, contrary to writers like Douglas Adams and Terry Pratchett who are able to maintain a high level of fun, entertainment, sarcasm, humor and wit throughout their books, Lewis Carrol can&#8217;t keep it up. The quality of the story varies between funny and boring, amusing and dull.<br />
The book is/was (?) banned in the province of Hunan, China, beginning in 1931 for its portrayal of anthropomorphized animals acting on the same level of complexity as human beings. <em>Duh?</em></p>
<p><strong>Ratings:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-751" title="Rating 2.5 of 5" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/rating25.gif" alt="Rating 2.5 of 5" width="75" height="15" /> for <strong>Lady Chatterley&#8217;s Lover</strong> by D.H. Lawrence</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-752" title="Rating 3.5 of 5" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/rating35.gif" alt="Rating 3.5 of 5" width="75" height="15" /> for <strong>Fanny Hill or Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure</strong> by John Cleland</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-451" title="Rating: 3 of 5 stars" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/rating3.gif" alt="Rating: 3 of 5 stars" width="75" height="15" /> for <strong>Alice&#8217;s Adventures in Wonderland</strong> by Lewis Carrol</p>
<p>All three books are freely available for download. I am looking forward to next year&#8217;s banned books week. On my shortlist are Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, Animal Farm by George Orwell, Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, 1984 by George Orwell, Uncle Tom&#8217;s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe, and Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad.</p>
<table class="quotes">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>She had never forgotten that, if you drink much from a bottle marked &#8220;poison&#8221;,<br />
it is almost certain to disagree with you, sooner or later.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Lewis Carol</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Resources</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Banned Books Week: Celebrating the Freedom to Read (ALA)" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/bannedbooksweek/index.cfm" target="_blank">Banned Books Week: Celebrating the Freedom to Read (ALA)</a></li>
<li><a title="Banned Books Week (Wikipedia)" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banned_Books_Week" target="_blank">Banned Books Week (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a title="List of books banned by governments (Wikipedia)" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_books_banned_by_governments" target="_blank">List of books banned by governments (Wikipedia)</a></li>
<li><a title="Feedbooks: A place to discover and publish e-books" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.feedbooks.com/" target="_blank">Feedbooks: A place to discover and publish e-books</a></li>
<li><a title="Project Gutenberg - Free eBooks" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page" target="_blank">Project Gutenberg &#8211; Free eBooks</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/banned-books-week-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ervin Laszlo, Flying Under The Skeptic Radar?</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/skeptic/ervin-laszlo-flying-under-the-skeptic-radar/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/skeptic/ervin-laszlo-flying-under-the-skeptic-radar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skeptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laszlo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skeptic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who is Ervin Laszlo? Philosopher, author, president of Club of Budapest, member of the Darwin Project, promoter of Intelligent Design and Akashic field, promoter of the theory that 2012 will either bring Armageddon or a new quantum consciousness, and adviser of the UNESCO Director General. No worries?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Why the interest in Ervin Laszlo? It started after reading a column in the Dutch magazine <strong>Bliss</strong> titled &#8220;<strong>Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Why the controversy?</strong>&#8221; In my <a title="Design? No. Evolution? Yes. Controversy? Damn Right!" href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/skeptic/design-no-evolution-yes-controversy-damn-right/" target="_blank">previous post</a>, &#8220;<strong>Design? No. Evolution? Yes. Controversy? Damn Right!</strong>&#8221; I commented on the article. My comment was over 1500 words, which is a lot for a blog post, so I needed a separate post to discuss the author <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong>.</p>
<h3>Who is Ervin Laszlo?</h3>
<div id="attachment_871" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-full wp-image-871" title="Ervin Laszlo" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ervin-laszlo.jpg" alt="Ervin Laszlo" width="150" height="206" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ervin Laszlo</p></div>
<p>In the magazine <strong>Bliss</strong> he is introduced as a doctor, scientist, philosopher,   musician and author. Some research online revealed no medical or  scientific degrees; he is a Doctor of Philosophy and has an honorary doctorate in economic sciences. He is a philosopher of  science, but that doesn’t make him a scientist. Ervin Laszlo, or László correctly, has been busy, very busy. Some facts:</p>
<ul>
<li>co-founder of the General Evolution Research Group  (GERG),</li>
<li>founder and president of the Club of Budapest</li>
<li>member of the Darwin Project</li>
<li>founder and editor of World Futures &#8211; Journal of General Evolution</li>
<li>member  of the International Academy of Science</li>
<li>member of the World Academy of  Arts and Science</li>
<li>adviser of the UNESCO Director General</li>
<li>co-founder of the WorldShift Network</li>
<li>author of over 70 books and 400 papers</li>
<li>promoter of the theory that 2012 will either be the collapse of human civilization or the beginning of a new, quantum consciousness</li>
<li>former President of the International Society  for Systems Sciences</li>
<li>former program director for the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)</li>
<li>nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize twice</li>
<li>chancellor-designate of the GlobalShift University</li>
</ul>
<p>The list is incomplete. I will now discuss some of the organizations and projects. All links can be found in the resource section below.</p>
<h3>General Evolution Research Group (GERG, 1984)</h3>
<blockquote><p>The General Evolution Research Group (GERG) began with a secret meeting in Budapest in 1984 of scientists from both sides of the Iron Curtain during a critical juncture in the Cold War. Spurred by the mounting threat to our species of rapid nuclear proliferation and overkill, the purpose was to see if it might be possible to use the chaos theory then coming into vogue to develop a new general theory of evolution that might serve as a road map for our species out of the mounting chaos of our times to the reassuring order of a better world.</p></blockquote>
<p>The GERG now serves as the research arm to the <strong>Club of Budapest</strong>, a <em>prestigious group for advancing humanity</em> and is founded by <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong>. So, it all started with chaos theory, but by now <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong> has moved on to the psi-field, quantum, and Akashic field. Depending on what&#8217;s <em>in vogue</em>?</p>
<h3>The Club of Budapest (1993)</h3>
<p>Founded in 1993 by <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong> who is still the president, the mission of the Club of Budapest is to be a catalyst for the transformation to a sustainable world through promoting the emergence of planetary consciousness, interconnecting generations and cultures, integrating spirituality, science, and the arts, and fostering learning communities worldwide.</p>
<blockquote><p>Like Greenpeace fights for ecological issues, UNICEF for children, and  Amnesty International for human rights, the Club of Budapest stands for  global consciousness. Its mission is to be a catalyst for the  transformation to a sustainable world.</p></blockquote>
<p>Contrary to Greenpeace, UNICEF, and Amnesty International the goals of the Club of Budapest are rather vague. Distinguished Honorary Members of the Club of Budapest include the Dalai   Lama, Mikhail Gorbachev, Vaclav Havel, Peter Gabriel, Desmond Tutu,   Peter Ustinov, Jane Goodall, Deepak Chopra, Arthur C. Clarke, Paulo   Coelho, &#8230; Do they even grasp the gist of <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong>&#8216;s ideas?</p>
<h3>The Darwin Project (2003?)</h3>
<blockquote><p>The mission of The Darwin Project is to speed the shift in our homes, schools, and the media from only teaching destructive “first-half”  Darwinism to the inspiring liberation of Darwin&#8217;s long lost completing  half — along with all the fields of modern science that support and  expand Darwin&#8217;s original full vision to reveal caring, love, moral  evolution, and education as the prime drivers for human evolution.</p></blockquote>
<p>Darwin&#8217;s long lost book? Apparently they are referring to the &#8220;<strong>Descent of Man</strong>&#8220;, but this was in part a response to those who wanted to introduce a <em>design</em> in human evolution, not to support it.</p>
<p><strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong> and <strong>David Loye</strong>, author of the new evolution story &#8220;<strong>The Great Adventure</strong>&#8220;, must have found <strong>Charles Darwin</strong> long lost book &#8220;<strong>The Theology of  Species</strong>&#8221; (see the PS below). Apparently we have  misunderstood Darwin, because what Darwin really meant was:</p>
<blockquote><p>What primarily drives human evolution, Darwin wrote in  page after page of the long ignored writings that complete his theory,  are “the moral qualities.” These, he said, are “advanced, either  directly or indirectly, much more through the effects of habit, by our  reasoning powers, by instruction, by religion, etc., than through  natural selection.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Some further reading revealed that &#8220;<strong>On the Origin of Species</strong>&#8221; is to be blamed for the Robber Barons, corporate greed, environmental devastation, hate crimes, and Nazism. Not Charles Darwin personally is to be blamed, but the scientists who don&#8217;t understand Darwin&#8217;s complete work. You have to read the second part of Darwin&#8217;s work, &#8220;<strong>Descent of Man</strong>&#8220;, to see the whole picture. You can download the new story, &#8220;<strong>The Great Adventure</strong>&#8221; by <strong>David Loye</strong>, from the website of <strong>The Darwin Project</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the beginning there was<br />
the Domination System and the Organism.<br />
Then the Love System entered life and<br />
meaningful Evolution began . . .</p></blockquote>
<p>Honestly, I am not making this up.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>How did someone with such bizarre ideas get to be adviser of the UNESCO Director General or a member of the International Academy of Science? Or did he landed those jobs before he saw the light (quantum or Akashic)?</p>
<p>How did people like Peter Gabriel (musician), Jane Goodall (known for her long-term field study on wild chimpanzees), Mikhail Gorbachev (former President of the USSR), Vaclav Havel (former President of the Czechoslovakia and later on of the Czech Republic), Richard von Weizsäcker (former President of the Federal Republic of Germany), Óscar Arias (former President of Costa Rica), Paulo Coelho (bestselling author), and the list goes on, get involved with <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong>? Do they even know the extend of this man&#8217;s ideas?</p>
<p>His theory on 2012, that it will either be the collapse of human civilization or the beginning of a new, quantum consciousness, is a safe bet. No matter what happens in 2012 he will come out as a visionary: increased or decreased solar activity, abundant harvests or famine, natural disasters or not, border disputes or peace treaty between North and South Korea, civil war or peace negotiations between Palestinians and Israel, &#8230;</p>
<p>The difficulty in understanding his work is hampered by the many hats he wears and the many organizations, but it is all linked. Starting from the Club of Budapest with it&#8217;s many famous honorary members, there is a link with his personal website and forum on quantum consciousness, Akashic field, and other fuzzy new age thinking via some of the honorary members like Deepak Chopra and Barbara Max Hubbard. The General Evolution Research Group is the research arm of the Club of Budapest and from there you get to the pseudoscience of the Darwin Project. The main link is Ervin Laszlo, in the center like a spider in its web. It&#8217;s not difficult to be the president of several organizations when you founded them. When you stick solely on the information available on the site of  the Club of Budapest it is quite respectable, but you will not see the complete picture.</p>
<p>How can you be against a man who wants <em>love, peace, and understanding for all</em>? But at what cost? Must we give up the freedom from Enlightenment and return to the dark ages of superstition, replacing God, the Bible and the Catholic Church for the quantum consciousness and the Akashic field, whatever those may be. Ervin Laszlo compares the <strong>Club of Budapest</strong> to Greenpeace, UNICEF, and Amnesty International. I think a better comparison for the many organizations of Ervin Laszlo is <strong>Scientology</strong>!</p>
<div id="attachment_872" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-872" title="Radar" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/radar.jpg" alt="Radar" width="200" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text"> </p></div>
<p>While most of the honorary members of the Club of Budapest might not grasp the full extent of his vision, his partners in folly are Deepak Chopra, Michael Beckwith, Barbara Max Hubbard, &#8230; On his forum you will find articles like &#8220;Finding the Holy of Holies: Sticky Particles and the Ground of All Being&#8221;, &#8220;Geoesthetics: The Spiritualization of Art and Science in the Noosphere&#8221;, &#8220;Retrieving the Hidden Rays of Light: A Global Partnership is Emerging&#8221;, &#8230; You get the picture.</p>
<p>How is it possible he has been flying under the skeptic radar for so long? Do you want to give someone like Ervin Laszlo a global platform as Nobel Peace Price winner? Do you want someone as Ervin Laszlo as an adviser on a science committee? Do you want Ervin Laszlo or people affiliated with him as advisers to the EU or UN? I know I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>PS: The reference to <strong>Charles Darwin</strong>&#8216;s book &#8220;<strong>Theology of Species</strong>&#8221; comes  from &#8220;<strong>The Science of the Discworld III &#8211; Darwin&#8217;s Watch</strong>&#8221; by <strong>Terry  Pratchett</strong>, <strong>Ian Stewart</strong> and <strong>Jack Cohen</strong>. In the series our universe is the  result of a failed magical experiment by the wizards of the Unseen  University on the discworld. Being who they are, the wizards can&#8217;t help but  messing with our roundworld. The series discusses evolution, the role of  William Shakespeare and the role of Charles Darwin. Each chapter by  Terry Pratchett is followed by a chapter by Ian Stewart and Jack Cohen  giving the scientific point of view on the event or period. In the third  book something goes wrong again and we go extinct in the near future.  What happened? It appeared that Darwin wrote the wrong book, the &#8220;<strong>Theology of  Species</strong>&#8220;. Don&#8217;t fear, the wizards of the Unseen University come to our rescue and travel back in time to make sure Darwin gets aboard the Beagle and writes &#8220;<strong>On the Origin of Species</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<table style="border: medium none; margin: 20px auto; height: 55px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Religion is about turning untested belief into unshakable truth<br />
through the power of institutions and the passage of time.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Richard Dawkins</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Resources</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Ervin Laszlo" rel="nofollow" href="http://ervinlaszlo.com/" target="_blank">Ervin Laszlo</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Ervin László" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ervin_L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Ervin László</a></li>
<li><a title="Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Then Why the Controversy? by Ervin Laszlo" rel="nofollow" href="http://ervinlaszlo.com/notebook/2010/04/14/design-yes-evolution-yes-contradiction-no-then-why-the-controversy/" target="_blank">Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Then Why the Controversy? by Ervin Laszlo</a></li>
<li><a title="Design? No. Evolution? Yes. Controversy? Damn Right! by Johan Mares" href="http://" target="_blank">Design? No. Evolution? Yes. Controversy? Damn Right! by Johan Mares</a></li>
<li><a title="WorldShift 2012 - From Global Emergency To Global Emergence" href="http://worldshift2012.org/" target="_blank">WorldShift 2012 &#8211; From Global Emergency To Global Emergence</a></li>
<li><a title="LEARN USA - Who Is Ervin Laszlo?" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.learn-usa.com/relevant_to_et/ctd06.htm" target="_blank">LEARN USA &#8211; Who Is Ervin Laszlo?</a></li>
<li><a title="The Darwin Project" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thedarwinproject.com/home.html" target="_blank">The Darwin Project</a></li>
<li><a title="GERG - General Evolution Research Group" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.thedarwinproject.com/gerg/gerg.html" target="_blank">GERG &#8211; General Evolution Research Group</a></li>
<li><a title="Club of Budapest" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.clubofbudapest.org/" target="_blank">Club of Budapest</a></li>
<li><a title="Stock Photo: Radar by KimPouss via stock.xchng" href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1060323" target="_blank">Stock Photo: Radar by KimPouss via stock.xchng</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/skeptic/ervin-laszlo-flying-under-the-skeptic-radar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design? No. Evolution? Yes. Controversy? Damn Right!</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/skeptic/design-no-evolution-yes-controversy-damn-right/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/skeptic/design-no-evolution-yes-controversy-damn-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skeptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bliss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laszlo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skeptic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was my intention to write a short comment on a column "Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Why the controversy?" in Bliss, a Dutch magazine, but the more I read on the author of the article, Ervin Laszlo, the longer my article became. Then the second part of the column got published and I discovered that Ervin Laszlo's theory transcends ordinary Creation Theory and Intelligent Design. What a mess. I had to split the article in two; the first part is a comment on the column by Ervin Laszlo and the second part (to be published later this week) is on the man himself.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>It was my intention to write a short comment on a column &#8220;<strong>Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Why the controversy?</strong>&#8221; in Bliss, a Dutch magazine, but the more I read on the author of the article, <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong>, the longer my article became. Then the second part of the column got published and I discovered that Ervin Laszlo&#8217;s theory transcends <em>ordinary</em> <strong>Creation Theory</strong> and <strong>Intelligent Design</strong>. What a mess. I had to split the article in two; the first part is a comment on the column by Ervin Laszlo and the second part (to be published later this week) is on the man himself.</p>
<p>Why did I set out to write a comment on my blog? Well, I can&#8217;t comment in the magazine nor on the accompanying website. You will find all links in the resources section at the end of the article.</p>
<h3>Intelligent Design in Belgium</h3>
<p><strong>Intelligent design</strong> and <strong>creation theory</strong> are almost a non-issues in Belgium. Mieke Vanhecke, the CEO of the Flemish Catholic Schools (<em>VSOK &#8211; Vlaams Secretariaat van het Katholiek Onderwijs</em>) is on record saying that catholic scientists have accepted evolution theory a long time ago. So, no creation theory or intelligent design in Belgian schools, not even in the Catholic ones.<br />
Once or twice during the past years it made the news when an organization send books on creation theory or intelligent design to schools, but such initiatives are mostly ridiculed or criticized and the books end up in the waste paper bin.<br />
An initiative in 2005 by the Minister of Education Maria van der Hoeven in The Netherlands, a more protestant country, was so heavily criticized that she immediately withdrew her proposal.<br />
So, it&#8217;s basically a non-issue here and I hope it stays that way.</p>
<h3>Bliss</h3>
<p><strong>Bliss</strong> is a free, Dutch magazine <em>for people who dare to make choices</em> in The Netherlands and Flanders, the Dutch speaking part of Belgium. It is available at health food stores, wellness centers, golf clubs, cultural centers, &#8230;<br />
The contents: ads, ads masked as articles, ads masked as recipes, the occasional feel-good article that I couldn&#8217;t link to an ad, and columns. The ads are for books, courses, supplements, lotions, tees, quantum pendants, fairs, psychic readings, &#8230; Let&#8217;s be clear on this, some of the articles are good reads and provide some info on food and supplements, but the majority is hot air and snake oil.<br />
What compelled me to write about <strong>Bliss</strong>, was a column by <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong>.</p>
<h3>Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Why the controversy?</h3>
<p>Is the title of a 2-part column written by Dr. <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong> in <strong>Bliss</strong> (May en September 2010). This is about the column, the next article is reserved for Ervin Laszlo. In the magazine he is introduced as a doctor, scientist, philosopher,  musician and author. Some research online revealed no medical or  scientific degrees; he is a Doctor of Philosophy, a philosopher of  science, but that doesn&#8217;t make him a scientist.<br />
The original article is in Dutch, but I found the English version on Ervin Laszlo&#8217;s site.</p>
<blockquote><p>The debate among conservative Christians, Muslims, and Jews (the “creationists”) and natural scientists and the science-minded public (the “evolutionists”) centers on biological evolution. But on a deeper look, it concerns the universe in which life has evolved—or in which it was created. And, as I will argue, on this level there is no contradiction between design and evolution: both are equally needed to explain the facts.</p></blockquote>
<p>An example is the relationship between a cheetah and antelope. According to Laszlo it is impossible that cheetahs and antelopes have <em>evolved</em> to what they are today without a design to start with. He makes the classical mistake to limit the choice to design versus accidental. As it is impossible that the evolution of the cheetah and antelope is accidental, or the result of accidental mutations it must have been designed like this from the start. This theory is debunked in <strong>Evolution for Dummies</strong>, need I to say more? It is called co-evolution and predation.</p>
<p><strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong> feels very confident:</p>
<blockquote><p>That view marks the classical Darwinist position, still championed by a few (though always fewer) mainline biologists. Richard Dawkins, for example, insists that the living world is the result of processes of piecemeal trial and error, without deeper meaning and significance.</p></blockquote>
<p>So it is up to <strong>Richard Dawkins</strong> and his band of merry men to hold the fort, to stop the barbarians at the gate?</p>
<blockquote><p>It must be more, because the time that was available for evolution would not have been sufficient to generate the complex web of life on this planet merely by trial and error.</p></blockquote>
<p>3.8 billion years is not enough for evolution to take place! Could it be that as a  creationist he works with a different time scale, a couple of thousands  years up to ten thousand years maybe?<br />
I guess you could call it trial and error from a certain point of view.  Some random mutations (trial) occur within a species and over a period  of time some mutations prove to be more successful than others, they  survive and the others die out (error). A better description would be  survival of the fittest, natural selection or just evolution. The biggest mistake is to  consider evolution a complete random process; it&#8217;s random mutations  followed by non-random selection. You can even see for yourself how it works;  just give the &#8220;<strong>Blind Watchmaker</strong>&#8221; applet a try (program runs quite nicely, but  you have to close the browser window to close it).</p>
<div id="attachment_843" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/blindwatchmaker.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-843" title="Blind Watchmaker" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/blindwatchmaker-300x231.png" alt="Blind Watchmaker" width="300" height="231" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Blind Watchmaker</p></div>
<p>Then Laszlo introduces <strong>Fred Hoyle</strong>&#8216;s theory who compared the random emergence of even the simplest cell to the likelihood that &#8220;a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein.&#8221; It is also known as <strong>Hoyle&#8217;s fallacy</strong> and is quite similar to the <strong>infinite monkey theorem</strong> and has been debunked over and over again. Fred Hoyle was a great scientist, but he was an astronomer and way out of his league on biology and evolution.</p>
<p>The most part of my article is based on the first part of the column as it appeared in <strong>Bliss</strong>; I only got the second part 2 days ago and it gets even fuzzier.</p>
<blockquote><p>The creationist position would be the logical choice if—but only if—scientists would persist in claiming that the evolution of living species is a product of two-fold serendipity. But at the cutting edge, scientists no longer claim this. Post-Darwinian biologists recognize that the evolution of species is far more than the chance processes classical Darwinists say it is.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who are these <em>cutting edge</em> scientists, these <em>post-Darwinian</em> biologists? Are they real scientists and biologists, as in exact or hard sciences? Or are they scientists in the way <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong> is portraying himself as a scientist, but who are in reality philosophers of science, or theologians of science?</p>
<blockquote><p>Leading-edge scientists realize that the evolution of organic species is an orderly, highly coordinated process, even if it’s not mechanistic and deterministic. The evolution of the living world is part of the great wave that created particles from the underlying virtual-energy and information field misleadingly called ”vacuum” (and is better called unified field, nuether, or Akashic field).</p></blockquote>
<p>Now he lost me completely. How many theories can you mix in one article? Why didn&#8217;t he add quantum into the mix? These particles, are they also known as <em>midichlorians</em>?</p>
<p>For someone who refers so much to <strong>Richard Dawkins</strong>, <strong>Ervin Laszlo</strong> should really pay more attention to his books and documentaries. I am new to the skeptical writing thing, but am I correct to assume that creationists and the like don&#8217;t do a lot of reading outside their comfort zone?<br />
I am getting a lot more respect for <strong>Richard Dawkins</strong> and other prominent skeptics every day. You can make up a crazy theory in 5 minutes, but thoroughly debunking it takes days or even weeks.</p>
<table style="border: medium none; margin: 20px auto; height: 55px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>A lie can run around the world before the truth can get it&#8217;s boots on.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>James Watt</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Resources</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Blind Watchmaker Applet" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/mirror/biomorph/" target="_blank">Blind Watchmaker Applet</a></li>
<li><a title="Bliss magazine" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bliss-magazine.be/index.html" target="_blank">Bliss magazine (Dutch)</a></li>
<li><a title="Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Then Why the Controversy? by Ervin Laszlo" rel="nofollow" href="http://ervinlaszlo.com/notebook/2010/04/14/design-yes-evolution-yes-contradiction-no-then-why-the-controversy/" target="_blank">Design? Yes. Evolution? Yes. Contradiction? No. Then Why the Controversy? by Ervin Laszlo</a></li>
<li><a title="Evolution for Dummies by Greg Krukonis and Tracy Barr" href="http://books.google.be/books?id=n-C9qW5UPL4C&amp;pg=PA206&amp;lpg=PA206&amp;dq=evolution+cheetah+antelope&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=utKvgqe3Zd&amp;sig=KWgrK4SMlH8uAWQapa8UIZX70OM&amp;hl=nl&amp;ei=GBCNTJT5HceJ4gbXjICMCg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&amp;q=evolution%20cheetah%20antelope&amp;f=false" target="_blank">Evolution for Dummies by Greg Krukonis and Tracy Barr</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Akashic records" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akashic_records" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Akashic records</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Ervin László" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ervin_L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Ervin László</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Hoyle's Fallacy" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoyle%27s_fallacy" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Hoyle&#8217;s Fallacy</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Infinite Monkey Theorem" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Infinite Monkey Theorem</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Intelligent Design" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Intelligent Design</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Intelligent Ontwerp" rel="nofollow" href="http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Intelligent Ontwerp (Dutch)</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Maria van der Hoeven" rel="nofollow" href="http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_van_der_Hoeven" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Maria van der Hoeven (Dutch)</a></li>
<li><a title="Wikipedia on Timeline of evolution" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_evolution" target="_blank">Wikipedia on Timeline of evolution</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/skeptic/design-no-evolution-yes-controversy-damn-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My First Readathon</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/my-first-readathon/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/my-first-readathon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tao]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I participated in my first readathon last weekend. A readathon is an event during which people read books for a certain period of time. This can be to raise money for charity or just for fun. My first readathon was a read-your-own-books readathon, starting Friday morning and ending Monday morning. I managed to read 5 books between Friday afternoon and Sunday evening, but I cheated a little.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I participated in my first readathon last weekend. A readathon is an event during which people read books for a certain period of time. This can be to raise money for charity or just for fun. My first readathon was a read-your-own-books readathon, starting Friday morning and ending Monday morning. I managed to read 5 books between Friday afternoon and Sunday evening, but I cheated a little.<span id="more-800"></span></p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_810" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="size-full wp-image-810" title="Tao Te Ching" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ralphalandale.jpg" alt="Tao Te Ching" width="200" height="276" /></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>The readathon was organized by the <a title="Bibliophilic Book Blog" href="http://www.bibliophilicbookblog.com/2010/07/read-thon.html" target="_blank">Bibliophilic Book Blog</a> and the word was spread via <a title="Goodreads" href="http://www.goodreads.com/" target="_blank">Goodreads</a>.</p>
<p>The books I read were mostly pockets, with each having somewhere between 100 and 150 pages — this is the cheating I mentioned.<br />
My books in reading order:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>The Last Castle</strong> by <strong>Jack Vance</strong></li>
<li><strong>Lao Tzu &#8211; Tao Te Ching</strong> by <strong>Ursula K. Le Guin</strong></li>
<li><strong>Planet of Exile</strong> by <strong>Ursula K. Le Guin</strong></li>
<li><strong>The Many Worlds of Magnus Ridolph</strong> by <strong>Jack Vance</strong></li>
<li><strong>Lao Tzu &#8211; Tao Te Ching</strong> by <strong>Ralph Alan Dale</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>Before I started I thought that <strong>Ursula K. Le Guin</strong>&#8216;s translation/interpretation of Lao Tzu&#8217;s <strong>Tao Te Ching</strong> would be better than <strong>Ralph Alan Dale</strong>&#8216;s, but this was not the case. <strong>Ralph Alan Dale</strong>&#8216;s  book is a more modern interpretation of the 2500 year old verses, more  accessible, easier to read and beautifully illustrated with black and  white photographs to really get you into the mood. Doing a comparison on  Tao Te Ching books could be an idea for yet another article as I  already have read 4 of them.</p>
<p>I always wanted to read both <strong>The Last Castle</strong> by <strong>Jack Vance</strong> and <strong>Planet of Exile</strong> by <strong>Ursula K. Le Guin</strong> in a short period of time. The stories are very similar and so I thought, more than half a lifetime ago when I was a huge fan of <strong>Jack Vance</strong>, that <strong>Ursula K. Le Guin</strong> must have copied his work.<br />
It was only more recently that I discovered that both books were published in 1966. So who copied who? Or is it possible that 2 very similar stories were published almost simultaneously. I now say that <strong>Ursula Le Guin</strong> is by far the better writer. Her writing and storytelling is better, her characters are more real and you get to know them, even her fighting and battle scenes are better written. But the comparison between both books will be the topic of a complete article.</p>
<p><strong>The Many Worlds of Magnus Ridolph</strong> by <strong>Jack Vance</strong> is a combination of old school SciFi and detective story. A fun read.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>This one weekend I read 5 books, which gave me inspiration for 3 articles, including this one. All in all a productive weekend. But the fifth book proved a bit too much, it felt more like something I had to do rather than something I wanted to do.<br />
Still, it was fun, devoting a weekend to reading. I am looking forward to doing it again, but not too often &#8211; a couple of times a year maybe.</p>
<table style="border: medium none; margin: 20px auto; height: 55px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Don&#8217;t join the book burners.<br />
Do not think you are going to conceal thoughts<br />
by concealing evidence that they ever existed.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Dwight D. Eisenhower</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/my-first-readathon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-god-delusion-by-richard-dawkins/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-god-delusion-by-richard-dawkins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was in doubt whether to read this book or not. I don't like religious fundamentalists, so would I like a book by an atheist fundamentalist any better?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I was in doubt whether to read this book or not. I don&#8217;t like religious fundamentalists, so would I like a book by an atheist fundamentalist any better?<span id="more-782"></span></p>
<h3>The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins</h3>
<p>This is Richard Dawkins&#8217; impassioned rebuttal of religion of all types, denouncing its faulty logic and the suffering it causes. He critiques God in all his forms, from the sex-obsessed tyrant of the Old Testament to the more benign (but still illogical) Celestial Watchmaker favored by some Enlightenment thinkers. He shows how religion fuels war, foments bigotry, and abuses children, buttressing his points with historical and contemporary evidence. In so doing, he makes a compelling case that belief in God is not just irrational, but potentially deadly.</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<div id="attachment_794" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><img class="size-full wp-image-794" title="Wooden Leg" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/woodenleg.jpg" alt="Wooden Leg" width="150" height="224" /><p class="wp-caption-text"> </p></div>
<p>His arguments against religion, his appeal for a secular society and atheism, &#8230; are just brilliant. The way he picks the arguments in favor of a religion and the stories in holy books apart are eye openers and even hilarious on occasion. It will provide a lot of ammo next time you find yourself in a discussion on religion.<br />
He also does a very good job pointing out how expressions by or quotes from famous scientists, writers, politicians, and even the founding fathers of the USA are used out of context to support the idea that they believed in a God. While his explanation is a lot better than those by theists, by putting those quotes into context, it is also a weak point because most of those people are dead, so you can&#8217;t ask them what they really meant by it. It&#8217;s his interpretation against those made by theists.<br />
Another good point for this book is making connections; sometimes you read something in a book, and something else in another book, without making a connection. This book made me connect some dots. Some of the things the author wrote reminded me of funny quotes or witty remarks by <strong>Terry Pratchett</strong>. I am not saying that <strong>Richard Dawkins</strong> read <strong>Terry Pratchett</strong>&#8216;s work or vice-versa. Both are well-read men and it&#8217;s likely they have read the same books. When I read the part on pedomorphism, it reminded me of the SF-novel <strong>Protector</strong> by <strong>Larry Niven</strong>. These are just 2 of the more enjoyable insights. I had many <em>Aha-Erlebnis</em> moments while reading this book.</p>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<p><strong>Richard Dawkins</strong> is <em>a bit</em> too fanatical to my liking in his atheism. This is probably why he got his nickname <em>Darwin&#8217;s Rotweiller</em> instead of just being called a Darwinist. The content is very good, but the tone was too <em>aggressive</em>. I recently listened to an <a title="Token Skeptic: Episode Twenty-Seven – On The Separation Between Scientific Truth And Belief – Interview With Dr Pamela Gay" href="http://tokenskeptic.org/2010/06/29/episode-twenty-seven-on-separation-between-scientific-truth-and-belief-interview-with-dr-pamela-gay/" target="_blank">interview</a> with Dr <strong>Pamela Gay</strong> — a scientist, astronomer, writer and Christian — on <a title="Token Skeptic" href="http://tokenskeptic.org/" target="_blank">Token Skeptic</a> on the separation between scientific truth and belief. In it she said that when you want take action against religious fundamentalism, Creation theory, or Intelligent Design, you shouldn&#8217;t attack Christianity in general. Challenge the arguments by the fundamentalists, the creationist, &#8230; and you might even find Christian allies. <strong>Richard Dawkin</strong>&#8216;s arguments are good, but he wont be finding allies among moderate believers for keeping creation theory or intelligent design (ID) out of the science lessons. He might end up only preaching to the choir. There is humor in the book which made me laugh, but why doesn&#8217;t he use it more.</p>
<p>This book proved to be a slow read. I didn&#8217;t expect a page-turner, but I also didn&#8217;t expect to have to work my way through it. It&#8217;s not like the topic is difficult. Was the problem mine — a lack of concentration? Is it the author&#8217;s writing style? Is it the Dutch translation?<br />
It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time that I preferred to read the original English version of a book instead of the Dutch, my native tongue, translation. I would never have become the fan of <strong>Terry Pratchett</strong> I am today reading his books in Dutch. After reading the series &#8220;De Duivelsprinsen&#8221; I almost immediately sold my copies and bought the original English books, <strong>The Demon Princes</strong> by <strong>Jack Vance</strong>.</p>
<p>So, to those of you who have read <strong>The God Delusion</strong> by <strong>Richard Dawkins</strong>, either in Dutch or in English, was it a slow read, did you have to work your way through it, or was it a page-turner?</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p><strong>The God Delusion</strong> by <strong>Richard Dawkins</strong> is definitely a book that I am going to read again, but next time in English. The content is great, but I didn&#8217;t like his style that much. I did put his other books on my to read list.<br />
Be prepared; the many references in this book made my to read list a whole lot longer.<br />
Rating: <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-452" title="Rating: 4 of 5 stars" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/rating4.gif" alt="Rating: 4 of 5 stars" width="75" height="15" /></p>
<table style="border: medium none; margin: 20px auto; height: 55px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting.<br />
But it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Douglas Adams</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Resources</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="Token Skeptic" href="http://tokenskeptic.org/" target="_blank">Token Skeptic</a></li>
<li><a title="Photo: Wooden Leg by Mattox on stock.xchng" href="http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1149975" target="_blank">Photo: Wooden Leg by Mattox on stock.xchng</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-god-delusion-by-richard-dawkins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: The Fuller Memorandum by Charles Stross</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-fuller-memorandum-by-charles-stross/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-fuller-memorandum-by-charles-stross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Stross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fuller Memorandum is the third book in the Laundry or Bob Howard series by Charles Stross. The series combines hard science-fiction, spy thriller, and Lovecraftian horror. The first two books are The Atrocity Archives and The Jennifer Morgue.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>The Fuller Memorandum</strong> is the third book in the <em>Laundry</em> or <em>Bob Howard</em> series by <strong>Charles Stross</strong>. The series combines hard science-fiction, spy thriller, and Lovecraftian horror. The first two books are <strong>The Atrocity Archives</strong> and <strong>The Jennifer Morgue</strong>.<span id="more-770"></span></p>
<p>The book starts very strong, with a prologue titled &#8220;Losing My Religion&#8221; by Bob Howard, the main protagonist in the series. In this he writes that he started out as an atheist, and wished he could go back to the comforting certainties of atheism, but the nature of his work for the Laundry, Her Majesty&#8217;s occult secret service, as a computational demonologist have made him a believer of the One True Religion.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Truth is that my God is coming back.<br />
When he arrives I&#8217;ll be waiting for him with a shotgun.<br />
And I&#8217;m keeping the last shell for myself.</p></blockquote>
<p>The story in this book takes place a couple years after <strong>The Jennifer Morgue</strong>, the second book in the series. Bob Howard is now the manager of the Laundry&#8217;s IT-department and married to Dominique &#8220;Mo&#8221; O&#8217;Brien. Like with any hard working couple work occasionally follows them home, but when work includes zombie assassins and minions of a mad god&#8217;s cult things are rapidly spinning out of control. On top of that his boss Angleton disappears and a top-secret dossier, the <strong>Fuller Memorandum</strong>, goes missing. What&#8217;s the connection and who or what is the Eater of Souls?</p>
<p>Rating: <img class="size-full wp-image-452 alignnone" title="Rating: 4 of 5 stars" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/rating4.gif" alt="Rating: 4 of 5 stars" width="75" height="15" /><strong> </strong></p>
<p>I have some mixed feelings about this book. It&#8217;s still very good, but it&#8217;s not the same genre anymore as the first book in the series. It shouldn&#8217;t have come as a surprise to me, the second book was already different from the first, but the differences weren&#8217;t as pronounced.<br />
The first novel, <strong>The Atrocity Archives</strong>, is fast-paced, geeky, hard science-fiction with Lovecraftian horror and some elements from the archetypal British spy novel mixed with sarcasm, humor and satire. The third book, <strong>The Fuller Memorandum</strong>, is a Lovecraftian spy thriller. I don&#8217;t know if it can still be called science-fiction. A lot — but mind you not all — of the geekyness, wittiness, humor, satire and sarcasm have gone too. The characters have gained in depth and the storytelling has improved, but I liked the first novel of the series a lot more.</p>
<p>See my reviews on the <a title="Book Review: The Atrocity Archives by Charles Stross" href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-atrocity-archives-by-charles-stross/" target="_blank">The Atrocity Archives</a> and <a title="Book Review: The Jennifer Morgue by Charles Stross" href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-jennifer-morgue-by-charles-stross/" target="_blank">The Jennifer Morgue</a>.</p>
<table style="border: medium none; margin: 20px auto; height: 55px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Gene police! You! Out of the pool, now!</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Charles Stross</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-fuller-memorandum-by-charles-stross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: The Jennifer Morgue by Charles Stross</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-jennifer-morgue-by-charles-stross/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-jennifer-morgue-by-charles-stross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Stross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jennifer Morgue is the second book in the Laundry or Bob Howard series by Charles Stross. This review contains some minor spoilers.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>The Jennifer Morgue</strong> is the second book in the <em>Laundry</em> or <em>Bob Howard</em> series by <strong>Charles Stross</strong>. This review contains some minor spoilers.<span id="more-747"></span></p>
<p>Did you ever experience the feeling of being turned into a zombie while watching a PowerPoint presentation? Well, here it is for real, a PowerPoint presentation is used to turn people into zombies. After barely surviving this ordeal, Bob Howard, computer übergeek and demonology hacker extraordinaire in his Majesty&#8217;s occult secret service, must stop software billionaire Ellis Billington. Billington has managed to get his hand on a Soviet Cold War device that permits communication with the dead. He plans to use it to raise an eldritch horror, codenamed <em>Jennifer Morgue</em>, from the Stygian depths, in order to rule the world.</p>
<div id="attachment_765" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/jennifermorgue.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-765" title="The Jennifer Morgue" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/jennifermorgue.jpg" alt="The Jennifer Morgue" width="200" height="331" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Jennifer Morgue</p></div>
<p>The entire operation has been put under a specific geas by Ellis Billington, meaning that if the good guys want to win they have to play it by the rules of the archetypal British spy novel. So you have a huge yacht in the Caribbean, a very rich evil mastermind with a white cat, casinos, martinis (shaken, not stirred), and you also need a British secret agent. Don&#8217;t tell Bob, he&#8217;s not supposed to know.<br />
And you&#8217;ve got to have girls — Bond girls. There is the gorgeous looking (at least glamor level 3) Ramona Random from the Black Chamber, who planted a demon on her in order to control her — not just any demon but a succubus. Every man she has ever slept with died horribly less than 24 hours later. Can she be trusted?  Is she even human? What will Bob&#8217;s girlfriend Dominique &#8220;Mo&#8221; O&#8217;Brien do? Lie back and think of England? Yeah right, when hell freezes over.<br />
What is the role of the Laundry, Britain&#8217;s occult secret service? The Laundry wouldn&#8217;t be the Laundry if they played by the rules, at least to other people&#8217;s rules.</p>
<p>Rating: <img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-753" title="Rating: 4.5 of 5 stars" src="http://blog.johan-mares.be/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/rating45.gif" alt="Rating 4.5 of 5 stars" width="75" height="15" /><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Charles Stross</strong> did it again. This is the second book in the <em>Laundry</em> or <em>Bob Howard</em> series, where hard science fiction is mixed with the British spy novel and Lovecraftian horror, and spiced with humor, sarcasm and satire. Not as geeky, fast-paced and witty as the first novel in the series, <strong>The Atrocity Archives</strong>, but still very good.<br />
Click <a title="Book Review: The Atrocity Archives by Charles Stross" href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-atrocity-archives-by-charles-stross/" target="_blank">here</a> for my review of the first novel.</p>
<table style="border: medium none; margin: 20px auto; height: 55px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Gene police! You! Out of the pool, now!</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Charles Stross</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/books/book-review-the-jennifer-morgue-by-charles-stross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No More Pictures Of The Month</title>
		<link>http://blog.johan-mares.be/pictures/no-more-pictures-of-the-month/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.johan-mares.be/pictures/no-more-pictures-of-the-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.johan-mares.be/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past 7 months I have posted a monthly article on this blog with photos taken during the previous month. I have decided to pull the plug on the series.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>For the past 7 months I have posted a monthly article on this blog with photos taken during the previous month. I have decided to pull the plug on the <a title="The Month in Pictures" href="http://blog.johan-mares.be/category/pictures/" target="_blank">series</a>.<span id="more-732"></span></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong. It was fun: taking the pictures, learning how to use <strong>iPhoto</strong> first and <strong>iMovie</strong> later, creating my first video, uploading it to <strong>YouTube</strong>, and receiving comments from the viewers on this blog and on <strong>FaceBook</strong>.</p>
<p>So, why stop?</p>
<p>At the start, I had hoped I would be able to document my progress fighting this debilitating disease called <abbr title="Myalgic Encephalomyelitis"><strong>ME</strong></abbr>/<abbr title="Chronic Fatigue Syndrome"><strong>CFS</strong></abbr>. Alas, my condition got worse.<br />
This hasn&#8217;t stopped me from taking pictures, but I more and more found the monthly schedule too restrictive. I am still taking pictures and I intend to put them on my blog when I have enough photos on a certain topic. Some topics that I have in mind will only take a day or two under the right conditions, others will require a year or more.</p>
<p>Some of the topics I have in mind:</p>
<ul>
<li> Kitesurfing at Ostend Beach</li>
<li> Kitefestival at Ostend</li>
<li> the four seasons in nature reserves</li>
<li> close-ups of plants and insects</li>
<li> birds (per family or per biotope)</li>
<li> assignments from books on photography</li>
<li> &#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>Maybe I could even make documentaries with voice-over. As you can see, I don&#8217;t lack ideas, I just find that the monthly format has become too restrictive.</p>
<table style="border: medium none; margin: 20px auto; height: 55px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>We have normality. I repeat, we have normality.<br />
Anything you still can&#8217;t cope with is therefore your own problem.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right"><em>Douglas Adams </em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.johan-mares.be/pictures/no-more-pictures-of-the-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 847/929 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: blog.johan-mares.be @ 2013-06-20 08:48:35 by W3 Total Cache -->